God and his angels guard your sacred throne,

And make you long become it!

-Archbishop of Canterbury

King Henry The Fifth                        Act I, scene ii, line 8

Here is a fairly short consideration for the day. This is the Archbishop’s greeting to the king. Pure and simple. The archbishop has just entered the room and, no, he can’t just say ‘hello your highness’. He’s got to say this. It seems a bit overly obsequious, doesn’t it? 

 

I'm pretty sure God and his angels are in this picture somewhere.

Madam!

-Nurse

Romeo And Juliet                   Act III, scene v, line 37

A nice short line today. One word spoken by the nurse: Madam!

So, just who is this nurse, and what, in the context of the 1590’s is a nurse? Should we look into it? I imagine there’s a wealth of info out there. What if we just Google ‘Juliet’s nurse’?

Hah! Just as I thought. The first hit is Wikipedia which says The Nurse is a major character in William Shakespeare's classic drama Romeo and Juliet. She is the personal servant, guardian (and former wet nurse) of Juliet Capulet, and has been since Juliet was born.

According the Goodreads, the second hit, Juliet’s Nurse is a book by Lois Leveen which was engaging from the very first page. The story is told from the point of view of Juliet's Nurse, Angelica, beginning with the rather odd childbirth and subsequent death of her infant girl. Her voice is at times compelling, sensitive, humorous, and profound.

So there you have it. One further point of interest: per Wikipedia, only Romeo and Juliet have more lines in the play than the nurse. How about that!

Madam!

 

Here's a picture of one of my favorite nurses, the young lady in the center of the picture. That's Lucy on the left. She's not a nurse. And I don't know who that little guy is, photo-bombing from the far left.

If, in thy wisdom, thou canst give no help,

Do thou but call my resolution wise,

And with this knife I’ll help it presently.

-Juliet

Romeo And Juliet                     Act IV, scene i, line 54

Pronouns. In the case of today’s line, ‘it’. There are a lot of times in Will’s works (and certainly elsewhere, not just in Will’s works) where a line can be made a little more confusing by the fact that it’s unclear as to what or whom a pronoun is referring. In this case it’s not all that tough, just a little murky. I believe she’s referring to her resolution. She’s going to use the knife to help her resolution. And I believe her resolution is to kill herself. Good Friar Laurence, in his infinite wisdom, is going to give help in the way of a sleeping potion. And we all know how well that’s going to work out.

Now here’s something interesting. I ran into an article about Stephen Booth yesterday. Booth is a Shakespearean scholar and the article was about Booth’s writings about, and theories on, Will’s syntax. More specifically, and forgive me for trying to explain a fairly complex idea in one or two sentences, Booth talks about the way that many of Will’s sentences are structured in such a way as to increase the theater going experience. I know, that doesn’t explain it much, but the reason I bring it up at all is because one of the techniques that Will uses to do this, according to Booth, is the so called ‘garden-path phenomena’. In a nutshell, that’s where the words appear to lead us in the direction of one understanding or conclusion but in the end get us somewhere else. Now there’s a whole thing about how this affects us as readers or theater-goers and adds to the experience. I’m not going to pretend to be able to adequately explain this. But suffice it to say that today’s Totally Random line might fall into this category. What I mean is that Juliet seems to be telling the friar is that if he can’t help get her out of her predicament then at least just go along with her resolution (the predicament, by the way, is having to marry Paris). But she doesn’t end there. She adds the part about using a knife to help her resolution. That is to say, she’s going to kill herself. But the knife part is at the end and in a way unexpected. It’s in the syntax. Take my word for it. Here’s the article if you want to read it for yourself. Spoiler alert: it’s not very easy reading.

http://nautil.us/issue/18/genius/shakespeares-genius-is-nonsense

I was going for the unexpected. How'd I do?

You have not been inquired after: I have sat here all day.



-Mariana



Measure for Measure                          Act IV, scene i, line 19





A pretty simple and straight-forward answer to an equally simple question. You might be intent on finding out what’s going on in the scene, but you certainly won’t need to spend any time figuring out what has been said here. No tough words. No out of date meanings. Oh sure, perhaps a few too many words. The Duke, the guy who asked the question, said, hath anybody inquired for me here today? You or I might have said, nope. And if we wanted to add a little emphasis or detail, and I’ve been sittin’ here all day. But just the same, no need to spend any time explaining what’s being said. 

And so, class dismissed.

I figured I needed a good sittin' picture for today. This is me and Tom sittin' in the back of the boat cruising around a back bay somewhere in Delaware. Yeah, we could have sat there all day.

And knowing this kingdom is without a head,-

Like goodly buildings left without a roof,

Soon fall to ruin,- your noble self,

That best know how to rule and how to reign,

We thus submit unto, our sovereign.


-Second Lord


Pericles                                   Act II, scene iv, line 38



Once again we have a Totally Random line spoken by an anonymous henchman. He’s asking Helicanus to be the leader of the country. A few lines earlier we learned that King Antiochus and his daughter have been struck by lightning – A fire from heaven came, and shrivell’d up/Their bodies, even to loathing. Apparently the king and his daughter had been having an incestuous relationship, and the gods weren’t too happy about that. But you knew this because that’s the basis of this whole story.

One little tidbit related to that which I find interesting: It seems that Antiochus’s daughter has no name. She’s simply referred to as his daughter. I suppose because of the incest thing? I don’t know.

Anyway, Helicanus gets everyone to agree that they need to search for Pericles, and if they don’t find him in one year then he, Helicanus, will become the leader. So the goodly buildings are going to have to last a year without a roof; unless they can find Pericles sooner.

When we saw this I recited the 'goodly buildings left without a roof' line for WP. If you zoom in you can see the look of approval on his face.