Charges she moe than me?

 -Angelo

 Measure For Measure            Act V, Scene i, Line 198

Moe?

No, really, Moe?

I certainly have moe pencils than I could ever need. No, really I do.

 

The king is almost wounded to the death;

And, in the fortune of my lord your son,

Prince Harry slain outright; and both the Blunts

Kill’d by the hand of Douglas; young Prince John

And Westmoreland and Stafford fled the field;

And Harry Monmouth’s brawn, the hulk Sir John,

Is prisoner to your son:

 

-Lord Bardolph

King Henry the Fourth Part II        Act I, Scene i, Line 18

 

Okay, today we have the eighteenth line of the play…sort of. This play has a forty line Induction (prologue) given by Rumour. I should tell you that Rumour comes out in the Induction and tells the audience what he’s all about and that he’s going to play a part by having untrue reports being spread. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing in today’s Totally Random line.

Bardolph is reporting to Northumberland how the battle has gone. Northumberland, Hotspur’s father, is on the side of the rebellion against the king, so that all the news appears to be very good indeed…except it’s not. It’s not good, because it’s not true. It becomes apparent that Bardolph was not at the battle and is giving a second, or perhaps third or fourth, hand account. In other words, his account is based on rumour; false rumour. Very shortly Morton is going to show up. Morton was actually at the battle and informs Northumberland that his son, Hotspur, has fallen, and the battle was lost.

See, you can’t trust Rumour. He can be a real bugger at times.  

Now here is a perfect example of how a false rumour can get started. Jeff took this pic of Nina whilst they were in Amsterdam. He took it because from the back that guy standing next to Nina looks just like me. So they could've started the rumour that I went with them on the trip to Amsterdam, which of course I didn't. 

Rumour!

 

Has he disciplined Aufidius soundly?

 -Menenius

 Coriolanus                          Act II, Scene iv, Line 137

 

Okay, in this context Aufidius is a foe in battle. Knowing that, it is easy to construe that the intended meaning of the word disciplined in this sentence is beat or defeated. Not knowing that, and not having any sense of what’s going on, you might assume that Menenius is asking whether or not Coriolanus made Aufidius sit in the corner of the classroom with a dunce cap on. But if you were attending this play, and you’d paid attention up to this point in Act Two, you should certainly have a sense of what’s going on. If you don’t know what going on at this point, perhaps it’s you who should be sitting in the corner wearing the dunce cap. 

Talking about sitting in the corner of the class with a dunce cap made me think of this pencil, and I'm not sure why. Maybe it's because if the teacher handed you this pencil while you're sitting in the corner it would be funny in a very mean sort of way. Maybe it's because I know that most (all?) teachers nowadays would give you this pencil and NOT make you wear a dunce cap. Or maybe (this is the best maybe) I'm thinking of Coriolanus sending this pencil to Aufidius to let him know that he plans to 'school' him. Yeah, let's go with that last one.

 

O, what, am I

A mother to the birth of three? N’er mother

Rejoiced deliverance more.- Blest pray you be,

That, after this strange starting from your orbs,

You may reign in them now!- O Imogen,

Thou has lost by this a kingdom.

 

-Cymbeline

 Cymbeline                       Act V, Scene v, Line 372

 We are near the very end of the play Cymbeline. Just previously in the scene Cymbeline has found out that his long lost daughter, Imogen, is alive. Now, in today’s Totally Random lines he is finding out that he has two sons that he thought were lost as infants. So that’s the three that he’s referencing. It’s a pretty happy ending. I really don’t quite understand why this play is categorized as a tragedy. I'm also not one hundred percent clear why he's referring to himself as the mother to the birth of three. Father maybe, but mother?

I just so happen to have a pic of the three that I am father to. No, not mother. Father.

 

We thank you both: yet one but flatters us,

As well appeareth by the cause you come;

Namely, to appeal each other of high treason.

 

-Richard

 King Richard the Second        Act I, Scene i, Line 25

 

There’s not really much of a sincere thank you going on here. I really dislike getting a thank you where there's really no thanks involved.  

I ordered a dozen Tennessee Rounds from Musgrave Pencil Company. When I received the package it contained a few extra samples (one pictured above) and a hand written thank you note. Now, I guess you could say they're just looking for more business, but how often do you order something and get a hand written thank you note and an extra item that says Thanks? Me? Not too often.

 

Say there be;

Yet nature is made better by no mean

But nature makes that mean: so, over that art,

Which you say adds to nature, is an art

That nature makes. You see, sweet maid, we marry

A gentler scion to the wildest stock,

And make conceive a bark of baser kind

By bud of nobler race: this is an art

Which does mend nature, change it rather, but

The art itself is nature.

 

-Polixenes

 

The Winter’s Tale           Act IV, Scene iii, Line 93

 

Whilst it may sound a little bit like doubletalk (and perhaps be a little hard to understand), Polixenes is talking about plants and about grafting to crossbreed plants. But of course, the reference goes beyond the plants and has relevance to the fact that the sweet maid being spoken to by Polixenes appears to be a shepherd’s daughter when in fact she is a King’s daughter. No crossbreeding needed there.

This is actually last year's crop. I couldn't find any good pictures of this year's. Now I'm guessing there's a bit of crossbreeding involved in these tomatoes. To be sure, we didn't do the crossbreeding; we just buy the starter plants. But I'm pretty sure there was crossbreeding done somewhere along the line.  

 

You have among you many a purchased slave,

Which, like your asses and your dogs and mules,

You use in abject and in slavish parts,

Because you bought them:

 -Shylock

 The Merchant of  Venice                Act IV, Scene i, Line 90

 

Ahhh, The Merchant of Venice. It’s a very complicated play. Or perhaps it’s extremely simple. That’s the thing; it’s really hard to figure out.

In any event, this is the courtroom scene. We’re just getting started and the Duke (essentially the Judge) is trying to talk Shylock out of going through with the pound of flesh thing. He’s asked him to show a little mercy and then says How shalt thou hope for mercy, rendering none? To which Shylock replies

 

        What judgement shall I dread, doing no wrong?

You have among you many a purchased slave,

Which, like your asses and your dogs and mules,

You use in abject and in slavish parts,

Because you bought them: shall I say to you,

Let them be free, marry them to your heirs?

Why sweat they under burdens? Let their beds

Be made as soft as yours, and let their palates

Be season’d with such viands? You will answer:

‘The slaves are ours:’ so do I answer you:

The pound of flesh which I demand of him,

Is dearly bought; ‘tis mine and I will have it.

If you deny me, fie upon your law!

There is no force in the decrees of Venice.

I stand for judgement: answer; shall I have it?

 

So, bottom line, Shylock wants his pound of flesh. Period. End of story. It’s an interesting little speech, and this scene will go on. And we could spend the rest of the day and more discussing this scene, and this play. But not today. 

Now I would say that this is one of the most famous court room scenes in the history of drama. Off the top of my head two other real good ones that come to my mind are Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch in To Kill A Mockingbird, and Jack Nicholson as Colonel Jessup in A Few Good Men. How about you? Can you think of a really good courtroom scene?

 

I’ve had two real-life court experiences (that I can think of), neither of them particularly dramatic. One of them had to do with this house. It was a two-family that I owned and the tenants on the first floor screwed me out of a bunch of rent. I took them to small claims court and won the judgement, but the court didn’t do anything to help me collect the back rent. I’m not sure what, if any, relevance that has. On the other hand, do my pictures ever have much relevance?