Today’s Totally Random
Lines
Well, lords, we
have not got that which we have:
‘Tis not enough
our foes are this time fled,
Being opposites
of such repairing nature.
Earl of Salisbury
King Henry the Sixth
Part II Act V, Scene iii, Line 21
Well, it’s only three lines; at least we can
say that. But I’ll admit that they are a little confusing. First, context: Salisbury
is one of the elder statesmen of the York faction and they’ve just defeated King
Henry & Co. at the battle of St. Albans. The King’s forces are in retreat.
Okay, now the three lines.
We have
not got that which we have. Hmmm. We have not got
that which we have. This is the beginning of the thought, so we’re not
missing something from the previous line. Hmmm, a bit confusing, eh?
Let’s move to the next line and see if that
brings us any clarity. These two are pretty clear – Pete’s version: It’s not enough that we’ve got them on the
run, because retreating is not in their nature. And then the thought that
is not stated, but implied: if retreat is
not in their nature, than this ‘retreat’ is simply the prelude to their next
action.
Okay, does that give clarity to we have not got
that which we have. I think it does. I think Salisbury is saying that we’ve won
the battle but not the war. We’ve not got (complete) victory yet, even though
we have victory (in this battle).
How’s that? I think it’s pretty good. And since
it’s a nice short scene, and it’s Saturday morning, I think I’ll listen to the
scene. Good day to you.
Here, from my sticker book, is a V for victory. But since it stands for a victory that they have, but don't have, it's a V with a very squirrelly little guy in it.
Also, in keeping with the have but don't have theme, it's a sticker, but it's not been taken out of the book. So it a sticker that's not been stuck. Therefore, is it really a sticker?
Did you get that? Or did you not get that? Perhaps you got it, but didn't get it?
Should I stop now?